Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Main discussion area is here. Reply to a message to continue a discussion thread, or create your own new Topics.
User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Hillary!!!

Postby Crux » 2016 Sep 29 13:03

war on women.jpg
war on women.jpg (65.03 KiB) Viewed 4240 times


Vote Hillary!!! She's got female parts!!!!

User avatar
Wise One
Posts: 1957
Joined: 2007 Nov 02 09:33

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Wise One » 2016 Sep 29 15:51

I don't know whether there was any mistreatment of Bill's girls as follow-on fallout.
But if there was, why assign blame to just another one of his victims?
His suffering wife bravely endured more than many must, and changed things enough to keep their marriage intact.
This is deplorable, politically motivated, blame-the-victim garbage.
Which is all Republicans know how to do.

:coffee:
"If your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like Donald Trump."

User avatar
Cannoneer
Posts: 492
Joined: 2012 Dec 02 22:19

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Cannoneer » 2016 Sep 29 17:00

You are so right wise one, that blame-the-victim garbage is deplorable and that's exactly what Hillary did to those women who her husband had sex with.

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Like Bill Cosby...

Postby Crux » 2016 Sep 29 17:48

...more and more is coming out in recent years about Bill Clinton's past, and Hillary's roll.

Wise One wrote:I don't know whether there was any mistreatment of Bill's girls as follow-on fallout.
But if there was, why assign blame to just another one of his victims?


"For 41 years, Hillary Clinton has worked tirelessly to discredit and destroy women like that. Since 1982, she has been hiring private detectives to look into their lives and find anything that could embarrass them. Hillary once told private detective Ivan Duda to give her the name and addresses of all of Bill’s girlfriends, so she could “get rid of all these bitches he’s seeing.”"


Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/ever ... z4LgRUYz70

Even the NYT knows what you seem to have willfully remained unaware of "wiseone".


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us/po ... women.html

VOTE HILLARY and be done with it... I have a hard time believing your heart is in it. You will none the less.....
Bring on the Muslim Immigrants, millions of them. Raise taxes, and increase regulations, and BIG GOVERNMENT.

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Red Pilled Black Girl

Postby Crux » 2017 Oct 24 21:04

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcnwJyFcQsM

Here is a good one. Freethinking independant libertarian honest patriotic conservatarians DESTROY leftist orthodoxy,

LEFT AND RIGHT...

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Crux » 2018 Mar 31 16:21

Want to know what should scare the pants off you?

When the SCOTUS upheld the individual right to keep and bear arms, 5-4, the minority actually wrote and held there IS NO INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to self defense? Think about that and stop all the crap like "no one wants to take your guns away" or "no one is denying you the right to self defense".

User avatar
Wise One
Posts: 1957
Joined: 2007 Nov 02 09:33

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Wise One » 2018 Mar 31 22:44

Crux wrote:When the SCOTUS upheld the individual right to keep and bear arms, 5-4, the minority actually wrote and held there IS NO INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to self defense? Think about that and stop all the crap like "no one wants to take your guns away" or "no one is denying you the right to self defense".

Bullshit. You just make stuff up. Here is the Heller Decision, complete with two dissents, and your words are just not there.

The court case was about guns, not about sweeping rights to self defense, which of course everybody has and retains in perpetuity.

The court heard arguments about whether a specific regulation of a specific type of gun in a specific city was constitutional. The majority said no, and the dissenters said yes. In particular, the court reemphasized that right to possess firearms is not absolute and laws/regulations affecting this right are constitutional up to a point. The justices disagreed over whether that point had been reached in DC for Heller.

Finally, the dissenters held that the Second Amendment, for defense by guns, applies mainly to individuals in a well regulated militia, a position the Court had held for over a hundred years before Heller. They lost, with respect to the narrow conditions of the Heller case, but the general principal that reasonable regulation of guns for the public safety is constitutional, was upheld by the entire Court including the majority.

:coffee:
"If your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like Donald Trump."

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Crux » 2018 Apr 02 15:34

"Specifically, there is no indication that
the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the
common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution."

-Stevens on page 2

"The majority’s exegesis has
utterly failed to establish that as a matter of text or history,
“the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use
arms in defense of hearth and home” is “elevate[d] above
all other interests” by the Second Amendment."

-Stevens page 45

Breyer is of no help either, having sought to SPECIFICALLY DENY the right of individual Americans to keep and bear arms in HEAVILY CRIME RIDDEN URBAN AREAS....
It is what I said: Democrats like you AO, consistently seek to DENY BLACKS, and the vulnerable in URBAN AREAS the right to maintain, keep and bear the effective means of self defense. You consistently MISTRUST and seek to CONTROL and DISARM the good people...

User avatar
Coondog
Posts: 1565
Joined: 2008 Jul 08 15:14

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Coondog » 2018 Apr 02 18:20

Democrats........ consistently seek to DENY BLACKS, and the vulnerable in URBAN AREAS the right to maintain, keep and bear the effective means of self defense.


Blacks can't shoot the people they need to defend themselves from. Those people are called the police. The police shoot blacks whether or not they're armed because they can.

Consider the most recent catastrophic occurrence:

Someone is reported to be breaking car windows
Police confront first person they see
It's a kid with a cell phone
They see a kid with gun
They shoot kid in his grandmother's back yard
They police fire 20 shots
The police miss 12 times
The police hit their victim 8 times (six in the back)
Police claim (as always) to" fear for their lives"

Suppose grandma had a double barrel shotgun, kept for self defense. Suppose she shot & killed the police who had just killed her grandson. Do we even imagine her defense of "fear for her life" would acquit her of all culpability the way it will inevitably for the police officers?

A lot of set up to make a small point. Arming blacks in inner cities only makes them more vulnerable. Allowing police to consistently use the "fear for our lives" excuse to avoid accountability needs to stop. Police are there to protect citizens........not themselves.

Coondog :police:

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

He is a DOG for sure, doggedly dogging doo doo...

Postby Crux » 2018 Apr 04 22:44

AGITATION, a lack of reconciliation, and irrational propagation of meaningless stereotypes and progressive blather.
THAT is what coondog vomits, and eats, and vomits onto the ground and then slurps up, laughing all the time!

Coondog wrote:
Democrats........ consistently seek to DENY BLACKS, and the vulnerable in URBAN AREAS the right to maintain, keep and bear the effective means of self defense.


Blacks can't shoot the people they need to defend themselves from. Those people are called the police. The police shoot blacks whether or not they're armed because they can.

:police:


Coondog doesn't have the ability to distinguish statistical facts from fiction, gross hyperbole from reality.
Just another scum sucking blow hard leftist, posing too often as rational. Sad and not funny one wit.

A CASUAL interest would inform "coondog" that blacks kill other BLACKS at alarming rates, vs other "racial" groups.
AS WELL, blacks are far more likely to be shot by a black cop than a white cop. CURIOUSER AND CURIOUSER...

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

The so called DEMOCRATIC party...

Postby Crux » 2018 Apr 26 20:42

https://theintercept.com/2018/04/26/ste ... tillemann/

It ain't no party if your are either the candidate getting the shaft or the voter who isn't allowed to choose the candidate you want.

AMAZING EXAMPLE

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Teacher's Union WHOA

Postby Crux » 2018 May 03 10:51

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... Gfa9pDYRPs

Awesome undercover public service from Project Veritas.

User avatar
Wise One
Posts: 1957
Joined: 2007 Nov 02 09:33

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Wise One » 2018 May 03 19:54

Yep, O'Keefe found some stuff that doesn't look good after cherry picking it out of thousands of hours of good and fully honorable behavior/interviews.

He's a slimeball who will do nearly anything to advance right wingnut hysteria. He was convicted of entering a federal building under false pretenses. plead guilty, and was sentenced to three years' probation, 100 hours of community service and a $1,500 fine.

The union guy's job is to protect union members. Where does that duty cross a line that should not be crossed? Many will argue and draw the line in different places.

For every union guy maladroitly defending a member, there are ten management guys trying to stick it to employees with crude, cruel, and illegal approaches that equal or exceed this one.

:coffee:
"If your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like Donald Trump."

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Oh look, here is another one off...LOL

Postby Crux » 2018 May 05 08:53

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCCIJ0tKpIw

Here is ANOTHER NJ Union President who in this instance cites a file on a teacher who had sex with a student and was PROTECTED.

AO is full of, well, BLUSTER. His mouth is a bluster-buss. These examples are not to be so easily dismissed by rational folks. They speak to a deeper and disturbing reality. Project Veritas is doing amazing and important work.

We can not heal AO. He is toasty. However YOU might benefit from PV.

User avatar
Kevsky
Posts: 131
Joined: 2013 Sep 24 07:32

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Kevsky » 2018 May 06 08:37

Wise One States:
The union guy's job is to protect union members. Where does that duty cross a line that should not be crossed? Many will argue and draw the line in different places.


Your actually defending a union official who is admitting he would and has "bended the truth" in situations where teachers have physically assaulted children?? And your saying this is a union representative's job and whether or not he ethically represents his member is up to subjective standards in regards to physical abuse of children? Your argument is completely incorrect and basically a crock of shit. Anyone.....I repeat, anyone who would assault a child should be disciplined. Anyone who attempts to shield a child-abuser through nefarious means or through subterfuge should be disciplined to the full extent available. The physical safety of the children should be the over-riding consensus of all persons associated with the teaching profession. The scumbag union representative states that he has kept a teachers job five times who was fired for drug abuse. And you are good with this? If it was your child who was physically assaulted by a teacher would you hope their union representative used any means, whether it was ethical or not, to clear the teacher from assaulting your child? I take it you would be okay with a union official keeping a physical assault hidden to protect a union member and would reverse the charges of the physical assault on to the child in proceedings, as stated by this union representative? I am not good with any of this. I am glad these vermin are exposed for who they are. I cannot believe anyone would actually be so indoctrinated in their liberal beliefs they would support such union activities over the well-being of children.

Wise One States:
Yep, O'Keefe found some stuff that doesn't look good after cherry picking it out of thousands of hours of good and fully honorable behavior/interviews.

And you have proof of these thousands of hours of good and fully honorable behavior/interviews?

Wise One States:
For every union guy maladroitly defending a member, there are ten management guys trying to stick it to employees with crude, cruel, and illegal approaches that equal or exceed this one.

And again, you have proof of this ratio? Maybe you can fabricate a graph or something?

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Now that is funny....

Postby Crux » 2018 May 06 18:58

Kevsky wrote:And again, you have proof of this ratio? Maybe you can fabricate a graph or something?

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Crux » 2018 May 09 17:58

Wise One wrote:The union guy's job is to protect union members. Where does that duty cross a line that should not be crossed? Many will argue and draw the line in different places.

:coffee:


Regarding AO's point above, we now have the 3rd Project Veritas video exposing the "LINE" AO speaks of: protecting child molesting teachers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQJpIvbLrd0

User avatar
Crux
Posts: 3206
Joined: 2010 Dec 16 19:44

Re: Hypocrisy Liberal Style

Postby Crux » 2018 May 24 07:59

Crux wrote:
Wise One wrote:The union guy's job is to protect union members. Where does that duty cross a line that should not be crossed? Many will argue and draw the line in different places.

:coffee:


Regarding AO's point above, we now have the 3rd Project Veritas video exposing the "LINE" AO speaks of: protecting child molesting teachers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQJpIvbLrd0


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkhE-5utEKI

And now a fourth, or is it fifth video this time in Ohio. "Shit Happens", you know, sexual altercations or physical altercations with kids.