Hi Fangz,
Thanks for your post! My knee-jerk reaction would be say "transplants" reflect the majority of dissenters. But, there is no way to quantify that, and, I'm sure there are opponents in both categories. But, like you, I see a difference in the perspectives, generally, of natives and transplants in the county. Transplants here seem to fall into broad categories: those who retired here for what they hope is an undisturbed utopia, those who came here as faculty at the colleges, and those of us who came here to work at one of the few industries in the area. Natives who choose to stay here are here for the long term, and their fortunes rise and fall on the overall economic health of the area. So, I think they are more likely to be receptive to new industries or groups, within reason. And, I think natives are more likely to see BSA as a nice feather in the county's cap, whether it results in a bunch of jobs or not. They realize that it just adds to the mosaic and reinforces that this is a desirable place to be. It's a source of civic pride to say we are hosts to the BSA Nat'l Headquarters. As a recent letter-writer to the Rockbridge Weekly web site pointed out, it's not the like the Hell's Angels are moving in, and I think most natives realize it could be much, much worse.
Now, as for the motivations of the dissenters, I keep coming back to that sense of entitlement that some people feel as property owners. "How dare they make a decision without consulting us?" or "I may lose 10 feet of my front yard through eminent domain" or "The increased traffic, etc. will be a burden and inconvenience to me". Well, many of the natives have already made those sacrifices. Ask the people who live along Rt. 11 when there's increased traffic due to industry, or tourism, or when there's a wreck on 81. Bumper-to-bumper truck traffic on 11 is probably a pain for them, but, it's temporary and sporadic. And, you don't hear them complaining. They understand that ownership is not a guarantee against hassle. If anything, it's a sure bet you're going to have to deal with some. We go along to get along.
As for eminent domain fears, I've been thinking about that lately, and it occurred to me that all of us property "owners" in this country are so blessed due to eminent domain. If the King of England had not presumed and declared himself "owner" of America and endowed the first foreign settlers (squatters) in this country with the "rights" of ownership (paying taxes to England), most of us couldn't own any of this country today. Although we think we have legal entitlement, we have no moral entitlement to this land we call ours. And, the rights of ownership we have established for ourselves are the same rights that entitle the BSA, legal owners of 4,000 acres in RC, to do with it as they wish, in accordance with national, state and local regulations. So, no more than most of us have to ask for public "permission" to set up residence here and to some degree enjoy the privileges of ownership, neither do they. And, our constitution guarantees them the right to assemble, and somewhere along the line some crafty entities lobbied for and got, the right to tax exemption for certain groups in our society. So, here we are, all exercising our "rights" as American citizens, and fussing about the very system that our ancestors laid out for us.
Speaking of ancestors, I can't believe Beck would insult that monkey from which we are all descended!
