First, there is no such thing as the Democrat Party. It's called the Democratic Party! Seldom does a speech impediment transfer into writing.....but if it's necessary for comprehension, one supposes that we can refer to the conservative branch as Republi Party.
Sounds kind of Mexican, eh? What other words might we drop letters off the end of to make them sound audibly less attractive?
Second....not everything is entirely a left vs right issue. Anyone who lines up 100% on either side of that spectrum is a complete idiot.
Third.....it's not about how much money one has, it's what one does with that money.
There is no question that there is big money on both sides of the political spectrum. One plays by the rules (or lack thereof) as they exist. This is necessary to compete, whether you agree with them or not.
The point is, one side believes that unlimited dark money is a corrupting force in politics. The other clearly does not. One side seeks to limit the impact of singular influence, the other wishes to expand it.
One side wants to limit access of certain legitimate voters to the polls, the other wants to expand it.
One side is self serving, the other seeks to serve the interests of the broader population.
Money.....Power......its how you use it that counts. Breaking down limitations that stand to preserve equity of membership in society, whether it be in the form of influence trafficking or firearm usage, serves to destroy that equity and society as a whole.
We can embrace some sort of compromise....or we might as well start shooting one another right now and get it over with!
According to old WWII footage, it looks something like this: